What's the best aircraft combat simulator out there?(PC)?
kyle
2013-05-03 06:57:02 UTC
-Lots of aircraft/(helis?)
-Challenging AI
-"Realistic" controls and UI stuffs
dont include ace combat and hawx cuz i already played them.
-
Four answers:
?
2013-05-03 07:25:53 UTC
Hawx and Ace Combat hardly qualify as realistic. If it's realism you want, look into IL-2 Sutrmovik: Cliffs of Dover for a good WW2 flight sim, or DCS: A-10C Warthog for a more modern experience. There's also DCS: Black Shark for helicopters, but it's four years old by now. All three games are quite realistic, though A-10C is quite a bit more complex since it's a modern aircraft. But if it's arcade action you want, Battlefield 3 is the only worthwhile game I can think of with both jets and helicopters.
Nakia
2016-05-01 08:57:51 UTC
1
?
2016-02-04 12:22:35 UTC
Experience Real Flight Simulation Guaranteed : http://LatestFlightSimulator.com
tyrrell
2017-02-24 13:45:48 UTC
Your question is extremely vast and an entire answer might desire to fill a e book. the subject of simulators is extremely complicated. the main variations between Flight Simulator and real flying contain (yet are no longer constrained to): a million. there is not any action in Flight Simulator. it extremely is an argument for aerobatics and intense-overall performance maneuvers, and in some particular circumstances for seen flight. It creates a marginally diverse ecosystem for IFR—nonetheless probably disorienting, as in real existence, yet in a various way (loss of action as a substitute of deceptive action). 2. The seen field in Flight Simulator is very constrained while in comparison with a real airplane. In FS, you have purely a window that exhibits the sky forward. In a real airplane, you usually have great homestead windows on a minimum of three factors of the cockpit, offering you a a lot wider view. you additionally can flow your head and notice issues from diverse angles in a real airplane (even nonetheless contraptions inclusive of TrackIR enable this in the sim, too). The smaller seen field is principally a handicap for VFR flight. 3. The ingredient of terrain is a lot decrease in the sim than that's in real existence. it extremely is principally a difficulty for navigation via pilotage and delight in VFR flights. the main landmarks are there in the sim, however the small information are lacking. the main explanation for it extremely is the dimensions and fee of the database that would desire to be required to furnish high quality ingredient for the whole planet's floor. 4. Many airplane structures are lacking from the default airplane. upload-on airplane do a lot greater desirable, yet they almost never reproduce each equipment attainable to the pilot(s). 5. There are variations in flight dynamics and how controls behave (no administration pressures for trim, working example). in spite of the reality that, in case you stepped right into a real cockpit after flying Flight Simulator, particularly in case you utilize progressed upload-ons, you does not sense out of place, and you will have an significant head initiate on getting to know to fly the real ingredient.
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.